SC: Big Relief on ITC front. Remittance of tax by Supplier not be the only reason.
Hon’ble ๐๐ฎ๐ฉ๐ซ๐๐ฆ๐ ๐๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ญ ๐ฑ๐ถ๐๐บ๐ถ๐๐๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฝ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐๐บ๐ฒ๐ป๐'๐ ๐ฆ๐๐ฃ ๐ฎ๐ด๐ฎ๐ถ๐ป๐๐ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐๐ฎ๐น๐ฐ๐๐๐๐ฎ ๐๐ ๐ท๐๐ฑ๐ด๐บ๐ฒ๐ป๐ ๐ถ๐ป ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐ผ๐ณ ๐ฆ๐๐ป๐ฐ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ณ๐ ๐๐ป๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ด๐ ๐ฃ๐๐. ๐๐๐ฑ.
The Supreme Court has ๐ฑ๐ถ๐๐บ๐ถ๐๐๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฝ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐๐บ๐ฒ๐ป๐'๐ ๐ฆ๐๐ฃ ๐ฎ๐ด๐ฎ๐ถ๐ป๐๐ ๐๐ต๐ฒ wherein it was held that the *purchasing dealer's ITC cannot be denied by the department on the ground that supplying dealer has not remitted the tax so collected unless there is an exceptional case like the supplier going missing or any situation wherein it becomes impossible for the department to collect tax from such a supplier
Hon’ble Supreme Court dismissed the Special Leave Petition (SLP) against the Calcutta High Court judgment.
The case involved the denial of Input Tax Credit (ITC) to a purchasing dealer by the department based on the supplying dealer's failure to remit tax.
Hon’ble High Court ruling emphasized that ITC cannot be denied unless exceptional circumstances exist, such as the supplier going missing or situations where tax collection becomes impossible.
Diary No. 44242/2023

Comments
Post a Comment